- Видео 2
- Просмотров 216 953
awal street journal
Австралия
Добавлен 8 окт 2013
Channel for my playlists.
Twitter: @anpremi
Website: awalpremi.com
Business: thepremi.com
Twitter: @anpremi
Website: awalpremi.com
Business: thepremi.com
Systems Thinking Speech by Dr. Russell Ackoff
Systems Thinking Speech by Dr. Russell Ackoff
Просмотров: 200 578
Видео
Donella Meadows Down to Earth
Просмотров 16 тыс.8 лет назад
Donella Meadows "Down to Earth" speech delivered in 1993 at a Sustainability Conference in Costa Rica.
Glad to have ran into this video. Wow!
Never been happier
bro this lady is SPITTING
Redesign Thank you
Failure of the Education system to distinguish between the various forms of the 'content of the mind'
❤❤❤ Amazing👏
Sense at every minute spoken. Got hooked from the start. I like!
Learned more in 1 hour than in 4 years of college
DIKUW = data -> information -> knowledge -> understanding -> wisdom Thank you Dr.
This is golden, should be taught at all schools from kindergarten
"examinations are about trying to anticipate the answers expected about the teacher - expected answers cannot be creative, they're already known"
if you forced them to put elevators in the buildings the rent would be more expensive.
WHAT YEAR IS THIS?
Thanks
What a good teacher. Wonderful storytelling!
Superb lecture. ❤
Fantastic! Resolving problems I work on in my workplace violence prevention consulting practice does not call for a cookie-cutter solution but a leadership one that addresses the problem at hand. .
His teaching brings light and healing to humanity😊
Everytime we solve a problem we create another one.
This is brilliant
Thank you it was amazing
How exactly did the student circumvent the task Ackoff was asking for 25:00 I don't get it
It is very clear that 30 years after Sustainability Science emerged, based on the results, it is the Science of the Possible, we have to go ahead and formulate the Science for the world we want, the Science without limits of imagination, to materialize our dreams, a Science that brings responsiveness and responsibility
It is very clear that 30 years after Sustainability Science emerged, based on the results, it is the Science of the Possible, we have to go ahead and formulate the Science for the world we want, the Science without limits of imagination, to materialize our dreams, a Science that brings responsiveness and responsibility
It is too bad we can't agree to see reality similar enough to not war with each other. In my country we can't agree on pandemic procedures or political pandemonium, so we are NEVER going to work together towards anything to mitigate or alleviate the humanitarian bottleneck we are quickly approaching.
Who else waited for the applause to end? Get a feeling of giving a standing ovation after listening to this.
Brilliant, witty and provocative
Salute for the richness in thoughts
An 'inspiring' writer that would love to see the depopulation of at least 7 billion people. A sickening individual using science to wipe out humans. This kind of people should be called serial killers or better call them Mass Murderers. This kind of evil people are gonna trick millions of people to believe that our planet 'suffers 'to justify depopulation using climate change and their beloved word 'sustainability' as tools. Shame on her and anybody believing her lies! Hypocrites and blasphemers! Above all, misanthropists with no fear of God!
she did a great favor to humanity, however late. She told us that there are limits to everything - overshoot always leads to collapse. And collapsing we are, by all means, today. Modern civilization epic failure. 8 billion cases studies...
"The parts don't fit... its the way that the parts fit together that determines the performance of the system."
My question: Are systems "entity" inside the world made by nature? or Do man define them from outside? Defined -)with words, because we designed them e.g. "automobil" -)with concepts, because we identyfied them e.g. in nature or soceitities.
My understanding was it’s from the external perspective - what does the observer behold? The example of the automobile, it can only be called such when it retains the ability to transport … if deconstructed, then even if all the parts are available but in this state it is unable to ‘transport’ it is not accurate to refer to it as an automobile, it’s a collection of automobile parts. Extending this concept further, the engine is now a system … whilst it is not powering the automobile, it could still provide some form of energy … but deconstruct the engine into cylinders, cranks and so on it loose that ability. The use of the word ‘nature’ in your question confuses me, ‘nature’ suggests to me something that exists without human interaction.
@@julesvern6215... thanks .... yes ... in my understanding, "nature" consists of entities, without any purpose ... So the question is, how is the relationship between - immaterial objects as figures or mathematical structures up to - elementary material objects as molecules or stones .... or humans ...? I think, the relationship from immaterial to material is the same, as when we kill the wavefunction .... the trigger is an "idea" from, not an "observer", but a "human action" .... my conclusion: a system is never there, existent without man .... we and only we bring it into the world .... we can never detect a system; we are forced to construct it bases on ideas, wishes ...
l love it. Yes Profound
#Mind, Desire, Problem & Conciousness Desire is not the problem rather Desire is because of the problem and mind uses it as a means to avoid confronting the problem. Since the very confrontation of problem is solution which requires courage and courageousness is antithetical for the authority of mind which is build on creating insecurity and seeking security in the name of desire. Therefore be aware enough to reflect on cunningness of mind to realise how & why desire born at the first place to realise and celebrate the freedom of conciousness. "Consciousness does not provide solution to the existing problem rather it eradicate the exsistence of problem in solving it"
can someone tell me the year he spoke this? I need to cite it for my essay
1991
In my understanding, she enlightened
"In any system, when one improves the performance of the parts taken separately: the performance of the whole does not necessarily improve, and frequently gets worse."
3:32
I find it so difficult to agree when he said. If you improve an individual component of a system it can improve the systems as a whole depending on the individual part of the system which is being improved. Example imagine I want gain muscle and my system to make this happen is eat protein, train and recover if improve in a individual part like I train harder I’ll likely gain more muscle so one individual component just improved my whole system.
@@leonardportuondo2403 Does your muscle grow independently? No just as you say it relied on your stomach GI system to process the protein you ate. And will it perform without your brain telling it or your bones being adequately strong to support the muscles… Improving one component in isolation without consideration to the others is not system thinking. Not is he saying you shouldn’t improve a component. Just consider the interaction that each component has on the others and the whole.
@@swampyhiker I agree with the idea that you should consider the interaction that each component has with others and the whole, but I 100% disagree with the notion that one component in a system cannot affect the whole system. Here are two examples of how a single component can impact a system or multiple systems. A vehicle is made up of interconnected parts to achieve the functionality of driving. If you remove something as simple as the battery, the vehicle can no longer function despite the whole system being intact. Another more complex example is the incident of the Ever Given cargo ship getting stuck in the Suez Canal in 2021, which also shows how a single element can disrupt a huge interconnected system. The Suez Canal is one of the world’s busiest trade routes, and the blockage of a single cargo ship stopped the transit of hundreds of other vessels, affecting global shipping and causing substantial economic impacts.
20:20 on Revolution
the heart and core of the matter! Thank you #3rdSpace for posting this in your newsletter!
mindblow. tks for sharing this diamond
P
Interesting views. However Dr. Russell Ackoff had to accept all principles and concepts of traditional education system during all his life to advance to his extraordinary level of wisdom
Thank you for posting. She was an inspiring leader. And a pioneering systems thinker.
His all briliant idea brif in just 15 second from 46:00 to 46:16 min.
Currently pursuing a climate fellowship (Learning For Action) with Terra.do where I came across this video. Our first assignment is to envision a world in 2040 where climate change problems have been solved for. We are tasked with a few questions as follows 1. How did we get here? 2. What role did you play in making this world a reality? 3. What is the biggest challenge you faced along the way, and how did you overcome it? I think asking each other (parents, friends, teachers, politicians) our visions of the world is very important
Kubang. 1868.
An impressing Women, and an even more impressive teacher.. heard some of her lectures about System Dynamics beein courious looking how limits to growth was constucted.. She was a great human as i feel
Since the early 1990's we have emitted half the CO2 what us as humanity ever emitted .... Thats where we were going since she spoke ... Good luck with the rest .
one of the best talks I've come across on YT
For real
1:04:25 a part is never modified unless it makes the whole better
absolution, resolution, solution, dissolution
52:52 Nobody owns a problem; every problem is universal